Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Articles

The Dynamics of Islamic Thought in Responding to Contemporary Challenges

PDF
  • Hicham Diouane,
  • Muhammad K. Ridwan,
  • Muhammad Zawil Kiram,
  • Abdalrahman Abulmajd
Hicham Diouane
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tetouan, Morocco
Muhammad K. Ridwan
Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Muhammad Zawil Kiram
The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Abdalrahman Abulmajd
Islamic University of Minnesota, Minnetonka, United States
"islamic thought"

Published 2025-06-05

Keywords

  • Islamic Thought,
  • Ijtihad,
  • Reform,
  • Contextualization,
  • Contemporary Challenges

Copyright (c) 2025 Hicham Diouane, Muhammad K. Ridwan, Muhammad Zawil Kiram, Abdalrahman Abulmajd (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the development and transformation of Islamic thought from its classical roots to contemporary expressions, with a focus on how it responds to modern global challenges such as democracy, human rights, gender equality, and environmental issues. The theoretical framework draws upon the works of classical and modern Islamic scholars, including Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Muhammad Abduh, and Fazlur Rahman, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between wahy (revelation) and aql (reason), as well as the concept of ijtihad (independent reasoning) and contextual interpretation. Using a qualitative, descriptive-analytical method, this study analyzes selected texts and scholarly contributions to trace the historical trajectory and current discourse within Islamic thought. The findings indicate that Islamic thought is not monolithic, but rather evolves in response to historical and social contexts. Contemporary Muslim thinkers increasingly emphasize the need for contextualization, ethical renewal, and reinterpretation of Islamic sources to remain relevant in the face of current challenges. These results highlight that modern Islamic thought holds significant potential to contribute to social justice, inclusive governance, and human development when rooted in both textual integrity and contextual awareness. The implication of this research is the need to revitalize Islamic education and scholarly engagement with a focus on critical, reformist, and ethical approaches. The originality of this study lies in its synthesis of classical and modern perspectives within a unified narrative that frames Islamic thought as a living, adaptable intellectual tradition capable of informing contemporary discourse in meaningful ways.

PDF

References

  1. A. S.-Q. Haifa, “A Comprehensive Database for Early Islamic Thought and Spirituality: The Kitāb al-Lumaʿ by ʾAbū Naṣr as-Sarrāǧ aṭ-Ṭūsī (d. 378/988),” Z. Dtsch. Morgenl. Ges., vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 89–110, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.13173/zdmg.175.1.089.
  2. A. de Diego González, “The Limitless Zawiya and the Infinite Library. Rethinking the Epistemology of Contemporary Sufism and Digital Islamic Thought,” Antipoda, vol. 2025, no. 58, pp. 179–199, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda58.2025.08.
  3. N. M. Ali, F. Alias, H. A. R. Shah, M. N. Awang, and R. Abu-Mounes, “THE CONCEPTUAL NEXUS BETWEEN ISLAMIC FORESIGHT, ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND THE SHARIAH,” Malaysian J. Syariah Law, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 62–76, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.524.
  4. N. Ain Norman and M. Eisa Ruhullah, “IBN SINA’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO MODERNITY: INTEGRATING MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, AND EDUCATIONAL REFORM IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND CIVILISATION,” Al-Shajarah, vol. 2024, no. Special issue, pp. 225–248, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.vi.1936.
  5. A. Saemi, Morality and revelation in Islamic thought and beyond: A new problem of evil. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Iran: Oxford University Press, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197686232.001.0001.
  6. S. I. Laher, TAWĀTUR IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT: Transmission, Certitude and Orthodoxy. Boston Islamic Seminary, Faculty Associate in Quranic Studies, Hartford International University, United States: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216184688&partnerID=40&md5=5f47c3edf474da69e1c9824926eccf62
  7. Z. Razzaq and R. Nawaz, “MODERN REFORMS IN THE ISLAMIC THOUGHT WITH REFERENCE TO SCIENCE: A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT,” Al-Shajarah, vol. 2024, no. Special issue, pp. 37–57, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.vi.1928.
  8. W. Saleh and P. Brodeur, “The right of religious freedom in contemporary Islamic thought,” in Routledge Handbook of Freedom of Religion or Belief, Institute of International Studies, Montreal University, QC, Canada: Taylor and Francis, 2024, pp. 117–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732625-12.
  9. L. Elouazzani, “Human dignity and the pursuit of knowledge in Islamic thought: Insights from the Quran,” J. Infrastructure, Policy Dev., vol. 8, no. 12, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.9129.
  10. M. Khalilizand, The Attributes of God in Islamic Thought: Contemplating Allah. Philosophy Department, Freiburg University, Germany: Taylor and Francis, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003438106.
  11. A. N. AN, “Metode Riset Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir,” in Metode Riset Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 1st ed., M. Muthoifin, Ed., Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2025, pp. 1–485. [Online]. Available: https://mup.ums.ac.id/shop/agama/metode-riset-al-quran-dan-tafsir/
  12. M. Shaikjee, S. Mpendukana, and C. Stroud, “Qualitative Methods,” in The Bloomsbury Handbook of Linguistic Landscapes, Linguistics Department, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2024, pp. 19–33. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85198466131&partnerID=40&md5=6f46c4caeb87e82fa5c5e3758be11266
  13. C. Alfonso, “Quantitative and qualitative methods, and primary methods,” in Environmental Toxicology: Non-bacterial Toxins, Laboratorio CIFGA S.A., Avenida Benigno Rivera, 56, Lugo, 27003, Spain: De Gruyter, 2024, pp. 65–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111014449-003.
  14. W. Ayuni, A. Nirwana, and A. Nurrohim, “Bibliometric Analysis of the Development Map and Research Trends in Qur’anic Studies and Tafseer: A Scopus Database Exploration (1974-2023). JOURNAL OF QUR’ᾹN AND HADῙTH STUDIES, 12 (2), 95–116,” J. Qur’an Hadith Stud., pp. 95–116, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v12i2.36191.
  15. M. A. Zanjani, “Materialism in medieval Islamic thought,” in The History and Philosophy of Materialism, École normale supérieure de Paris, France: Taylor and Francis, 2024, pp. 60–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118879-6.
  16. E. Reisi, E. Rezaei, and E. Jafari, “MYSTICAL DISCOURSE ON THE LAST DAYS: A HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHIA ISLAMIC THOUGHT,” Teosof. J. Tasawuf dan Pemikir. Islam, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 221–239, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2024.14.2.221-239.
  17. O. Bychkov, “THE LATE MEDIEVAL DEBATE ABOUT THE NATURE OF PHENOMENAL REALITY IN FRANCISCAN THEOLOGY AND ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND ITS GREEK SOURCES,” Rev. Esp. Filos. Mediev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 167–199, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v31i1.17104.
  18. A. Tahiiev, “Understanding the ‘Spirit’ of Qur’ānic Laws in Contemporary Shī’ī Islamic Thought,” Interdiscip. J. Relig. Transform. Contemp. Soc., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-BJA10104.
  19. Z. Chuanbin and S. Chai, “CONSTRUCTING CHINESE ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND CLASSICS: Dialogue and Paradigms,” in Chinese Islam: Models of Interaction with State and Society, Northwest University, United States: Taylor and Francis, 2024, pp. 19–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003490043-3.
  20. Z. Qodir, “Contemporary Islamic Thought in Indonesia 2010-2023: Contested Public Sphere,” Insight Turkey, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 299–318, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2024262.15.
  21. A. A. Islahi, “Islamic Thought on Interest and Usury,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Money: Ancient and Medieval Thought: Volume 1, vol. 1, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Springer Science+Business Media, 2024, pp. 533–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54136-0_28.
  22. S. A. Malik, “Artificial Intelligence and Islamic Thought: Two Distinctive Challenges,” J. Islam. Muslim Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.2979/jims.00020.
  23. S. A. Malik, “Introduction to the Special Issue on Philosophy of Science and Islamic Thought,” Theol. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 354–358, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2230425.
  24. M. A. Ali, H. A. H. Kahachi, W. S. Al-Hinkawi, and M. I. Shok, “The impact of Islamic thought on sustainable development of the Arab Islamic city: Baghdad city as a case study,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, L. J., R. H., M. S., H. A., M. T.A.M., A.-S. H., and A.-J. T., Eds., Department of Architectural Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq: American Institute of Physics Inc., 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0150741.
  25. J. Safran, “Friends of the Emir: Non-Muslim State Officials in Premodern Islamic Thought. By LUKE B. YARBROUGH,” J. Am. Orient. Soc., vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 496–498, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.7817/jaos.142.2.2022.r0036.
  26. A. Thurston, “Northern Nigerian intellectuals, Sudan, and the eclectic style in contemporary Islamic thought,” Africa (Lond)., vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 798–818, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972022000602.
  27. S. M. Shahidullah and N. F. A. Manaf, “The Philosophy of Happiness: A Comparative Study between Western and Islamic Thought,” Kemanusiaan, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 121–140, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2022.29.2.6.
  28. A. A. Mihirig, “The Existence of Arguments in Classical Islamic Thought: Reply to Hannah Erlwein,” Sophia, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 429–444, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00816-2.
  29. S. Kourime, “OBJECTIVITY ISSUES IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT: A CONCEPTUAL APPROACH,” J. Ilm. Islam Futur., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 88–104, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v22i1.12736.
  30. S. Rizvi and M. Terrier, “The challenge of evil in Islamic thought: A brief survey,” Oriens, vol. 49, no. 3–4, pp. 173–180, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-12340009.
  31. A. Tavassoli and L. K. Teo, “Islamic feminist political narratives, reformist Islamic thought, and its discursive challenges in contemporary Iran,” Inter-Asia Cult. Stud., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2021.1886481.
  32. J. Janssens, “Arabic Humanities, Islamic Thought: Essays in Honor of Everett K. Rowson,” Ilah. Stud., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 122–125, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.121.221.
  33. M. H. M. W. B. Yahya and M. Rahmat, “Building moderate Islamic thoughts in indonesian students through dialogue-argumentative methods,” Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 288–300, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.36941/AJIS-2021-0084.
  34. M. al-Attar, “Theories of Ethics in Islamic Thought and the Question of Moral Pluralism,” in Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol. 16, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2021, pp. 59–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66089-5_4.
  35. R. Tottoli, “THE PROPHET JEREMIAH IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT,” in The Oxford Handbook of Jeremiah, Università di Napoli L’Orientale, Dipartimento Asia, Africa e Mediterraneo, Napoli, Italy: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 539–552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693060.013.20.
  36. M. Karabela, Islamic thought through protestant eyes. Queen’s University, Canada: Taylor and Francis, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091349.
  37. R. Gleave, “VIOLENCE IN ISLAMIC THOUGHT: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND PROBLEMATIC CATEGORIES,” in Violence in Islamic Thought from European Imperialism to the Post-Colonial Era, University of Exeter, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press, 2021, pp. 1–13. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212744733&partnerID=40&md5=74db1c1e15c040f7c650e21986b06fea
  38. Z. Ibrahim, Islamic thought in Africa: The collected works of afa ajura (1910-2004) and the impact of ajuraism on Northern Ghana. California State University, Fullerton, United States: Yale University Press, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85118332726&partnerID=40&md5=bfa405e140986064b72a36d3c8e31db6
  39. A. D. Rohayana and M. J. Sofi, “Critique of radical religious paradigm: An epistemological analysis from principles of Islamic thought,” Indones. J. Islam Muslim Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 163–184, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.18326/IJIMS.V11I1.163-184.
  40. A. Akbar, “Fazlur Rahman’s Influence on Contemporary Islamic Thought,” Muslim World, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 129–153, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12334.
  41. M. R. Wahab and M. F. Hamat, “The position of logic in islamic thought,” Afkar, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–42, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.1.
  42. I. S. Milsih, W. Fitri, and M. A. Masuwd, “THE TERM AL-HADID IN CLASSICAL AND CONTEMPORARY INTERPRETATION (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE QUR’AN & ITS TAFSEER AND TAFSIR MAFATIH AL GHAIB),” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 343–379, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v1i3.2058.
  43. E. Engkizar et al., “Challenges and Steps in Living Quran and Hadith Research: An Introduction,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 426–435, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v8i3.396.
  44. H. Hasanuddin, M. Masuwd, M. Ridwan, S. W. Mustamin, M. Saleh, and F. Fitrayani, “Legal Reform of Consumer Privacy Rights Protection in Online Transactions Based on Islamic Economic Law Principles,” J. Huk. Islam, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 313–342, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v22i2.3.
  45. M. Masuwd, E. D. Sumanik, S. Sarkawi, and M. A. B. Amer, “Measuring foreign language anxiety: Concerning students’ motivation and their self-perception,” Int. J. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2087–2099, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://injotel.org/index.php/12/article/view/233
  46. M. N. Ichwan, Mowafg Masuwd, M. Sya’roni, and N. A. Abdulghani, “Muhammad Abduh and Sufism: Building Spiritual Consciousness in the Context of Social Change,” Teosof. J. Tasawuf dan Pemikir. Islam, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 163–187, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2024.14.1.163-187.
  47. Paisun, Syarifah, and M. Masuwd, “Investigating The Relationship Between Teacher Self-Efficacy and Student Achievement,” Andragogi J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98–104, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31538/adrg.v4i2.1303.
  48. M. N. Ichwan, A. H. A. Ulama’i, M. A. Masuwd, and N. A. Abdulghani, “Sufism And Quranic Interpretation: Bridging Spirituality, Culture, and Political Discourse in Muslim Societies,” Ulumuna, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 655–689, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i2.1082.
  49. A. J. Fuad and M. Masuwd, “Religiosity and its Relationship with the Tolerance Attitudes of Higher Education Students,” Tribakti J. Pemikir. Keislam., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 213–228, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v34i2.3617.
  50. M. Sa’diyah, M. A. Masuwd, and A. F. Supandi, “Legal Problems Using AstraZeneca Vaccine: Hermeneutic Analysis of the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council,” JIL J. Islam. Law, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i1.496.
  51. M. Fatimah, M. Mustofa, Rizkiy Pratama Putra, M. M. Abu Zinah, and M. Masuwd, “OPTIMIZATION OF THE PRINCIPAL’S ROLE AS A SUPERVISOR TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF TEACHERS IN SURAKARTA,” Profetika J. Stud. Islam, vol. 24, no. 02, pp. 207–216, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v24i02.1986.